↓ Skip to main content

Resting-State Cortico-Thalamic-Striatal Connectivity Predicts Response to Dorsomedial Prefrontal rTMS in Major Depressive Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychopharmacology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
234 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
337 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resting-State Cortico-Thalamic-Striatal Connectivity Predicts Response to Dorsomedial Prefrontal rTMS in Major Depressive Disorder
Published in
Neuropsychopharmacology, September 2013
DOI 10.1038/npp.2013.222
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim V Salomons, Katharine Dunlop, Sidney H Kennedy, Alastair Flint, Joseph Geraci, Peter Giacobbe, Jonathan Downar

Abstract

Despite its high toll on society, there has been little recent improvement in treatment efficacy for major depressive disorder (MDD). The identification of biological markers of successful treatment response may allow for more personalized and effective treatment. Here we investigate whether resting-state functional connectivity predicted response to treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). Twenty-five individuals with treatment-refractory MDD underwent a 4-week course of dmPFC-rTMS. Before and after treatment, subjects received resting-state functional MRI scans and assessments of depressive symptoms using the Hamilton Depresssion Rating Scale (HAMD17). We found that higher baseline cortico-cortical connectivity (dmPFC-subgenual cingulate and subgenual cingulate to dorsolateral PFC) and lower cortico-thalamic, cortico-striatal, and cortico-limbic connectivity were associated with better treatment outcomes. We also investigated how changes in connectivity over the course of treatment related to improvements in HAMD17 scores. We found that successful treatment was associated with increased dmPFC-thalamic connectivity and decreased subgenual cingulate cortex-caudate connectivity, Our findings provide insight into which individuals might respond to rTMS treatment and the mechanisms through which these treatments work.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 326 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 23%
Researcher 61 18%
Student > Master 40 12%
Student > Bachelor 27 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 7%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 62 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 82 24%
Psychology 66 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Engineering 11 3%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 83 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2013.
All research outputs
#15,279,577
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychopharmacology
#3,481
of 4,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,933
of 197,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychopharmacology
#46
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.