| Title |
Erratum to: β-Amyloid triggers aberrant over-scaling of homeostatic synaptic plasticity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40478-017-0423-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Gilbert, Shu Shu, Xin Yang, Youming Lu, Ling-Qiang Zhu, Heng-Ye Man |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 3 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2017.
All research outputs
#4,210,168
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#781
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,680
of 307,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.