You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The use of parenteral nutrition in an acute care hospital.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.v42n8p395 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sai Wei Chuah, Doris HL Ng, Peiyun Liu, Huimin Liu, Jia Lin Ng, Khoon Lin Ling |
| Abstract |
Parenteral nutrition (PN) is an important supportive therapy. However, it is expensive and associated with significant complications. Our aim is to describe the patients given PN in 2006, to compare with the 2001 cohort and determine if PN had been prescribed for the appropriate indications. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 24% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 39% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
| Psychology | 4 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
#365
of 447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,828
of 207,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 447 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them