↓ Skip to main content

A Study on the Geophylogeny of Clinical and Environmental Vibrio cholerae in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Study on the Geophylogeny of Clinical and Environmental Vibrio cholerae in Kenya
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0074829
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Kiiru, Ankur Mutreja, Ahmed Abade Mohamed, Racheal W. Kimani, Joyce Mwituria, Robert Onsare Sanaya, Jane Muyodi, Gunturu Revathi, Julian Parkhill, Nicholas Thomson, Gordon Dougan, Samuel Kariuki

Abstract

Cholera remains a significant public health challenge in many sub-Saharan countries including Kenya. We have performed a combination of phylogenetic and phenotypic analysis based on whole genome DNA sequences derived from 40 environmental and 57 clinical V. cholerae from different regions of Kenya isolated between 2005 and 2010. Some environmental and all clinical isolates mapped back onto wave three of the monophyletic seventh pandemic V. cholerae El Tor phylogeny but other environmental isolates were phylogenetically very distinct. Thus, the genomes of the Kenyan V. cholerae O1 El Tor isolates are clonally related to other El Tor V. cholerae isolated elsewhere in the world and similarly harbour antibiotic resistance-associated STX elements. Further, the Kenyan O1 El Tor isolates fall into two distinct clades that may have entered Kenya independently.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 24%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 15 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#459,339
of 24,312,464 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#6,447
of 209,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,385
of 184,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#159
of 4,880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,312,464 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 209,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.