↓ Skip to main content

Assessing behavioural and cognitive domains of autism spectrum disorders in rodents: current status and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
238 Mendeley
Title
Assessing behavioural and cognitive domains of autism spectrum disorders in rodents: current status and future perspectives
Published in
Psychopharmacology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00213-013-3268-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martien J. Kas, Jeffrey C. Glennon, Jan Buitelaar, Elodie Ey, Barbara Biemans, Jacqueline Crawley, Robert H. Ring, Clara Lajonchere, Frederic Esclassan, John Talpos, Lucas P. J. J. Noldus, J. Peter H. Burbach, Thomas Steckler

Abstract

The establishment of robust and replicable behavioural testing paradigms with translational value for psychiatric diseases is a major step forward in developing and testing etiology-directed treatment for these complex disorders. Based on the existing literature, we have generated an inventory of applied rodent behavioural testing paradigms relevant to autism spectrum disorders (ASD). This inventory focused on previously used paradigms that assess behavioural domains that are affected in ASD, such as social interaction, social communication, repetitive behaviours and behavioural inflexibility, cognition as well as anxiety behaviour. A wide range of behavioural testing paradigms for rodents were identified. However, the level of face and construct validity is highly variable. The predictive validity of these paradigms is unknown, as etiology-directed treatments for ASD are currently not on the market. To optimise these studies, future efforts should address aspects of reproducibility and take into account data about the neurodevelopmental underpinnings and trajectory of ASD. In addition, with the increasing knowledge of processes underlying ASD, such as sensory information processes and synaptic plasticity, phenotyping efforts should include multi-level automated analysis of, for example, representative task-related behavioural and electrophysiological read-outs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 232 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 21%
Researcher 38 16%
Student > Master 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 38 16%
Unknown 36 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 55 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 16%
Psychology 35 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 54 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2013.
All research outputs
#15,296,926
of 24,255,619 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#4,223
of 5,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,950
of 206,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#34
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,255,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,516 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.