↓ Skip to main content

A queer-theoretical approach to community health psychology

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Psychology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A queer-theoretical approach to community health psychology
Published in
Journal of Health Psychology, September 2013
DOI 10.1177/1359105313500259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bróna R Nic Giolla Easpaig, David M Fryer, Seònaid E Linn, Harvey Humphrey

Abstract

Queer-theoretical resources offer ways of productively rethinking how central concepts such as 'person-context', 'identity' and 'difference' may be understood for community health psychologists. This would require going beyond consideration of the problems with which queer theory is popularly associated to cautiously engage with the aspects of this work relevant to the promotion of collective practice and engaging with processes of marginalisation. In this article, we will draw upon and illustrate the queer-theoretical concepts of 'performativity' and 'cultural intelligibility' before moving towards a preliminary mapping of what a queer-informed approach to community health psychology might involve.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 16 42%
Social Sciences 5 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,761,535
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Psychology
#1,235
of 2,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,151
of 201,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Psychology
#37
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.