↓ Skip to main content

Health-Behavior Induced Disease: Return of the Milk-Alkali Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Health-Behavior Induced Disease: Return of the Milk-Alkali Syndrome
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11606-007-0226-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph B. Caruso, Rajendrakumar M. Patel, Karan Julka, David C. Parish

Abstract

The milk-alkali syndrome is a well-documented consequence of excessive calcium and alkali intake first recognized in association with early 20th century antacid regimens. The syndrome became rare after widespread implementation of modern peptic ulcer disease therapies. With recent trends in osteoporosis therapy coupled with widely available calcium-containing supplements, the milk-alkali syndrome has reemerged as an important clinical entity. Our case illustrates a patient who self-medicated his peptic ulcer disease with a regimen resembling a common early 20th century dyspepsia regimen. When superimposed upon chronic high calcium supplementation, the patient became acutely ill from the milk-alkali syndrome. When taken to excess, or used inappropriately, medications and supplements ordinarily considered beneficial, can have harmful effects. Our case underscores the importance of obtaining a thorough medication history including use of over-the-counter supplementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 20%
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Arts and Humanities 2 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Chemistry 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,003,441
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#1,512
of 8,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,269
of 86,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.