| Title |
Randomized pilot of a self-guided internet coping group for women with early-stage breast cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Behavioral Medicine, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1207/s15324796abm3001_7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jason E. Owen, Joshua C. Klapow, David L. Roth, John L. Shuster, Jeff Bellis, Ron Meredith, Diane C. Tucker |
| Abstract |
Internet-based methods for provision of psychological support and intervention to cancer survivors hold promise for increasing the public impact of such treatments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 17% |
| Researcher | 31 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 88 | 44% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,348,542
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#1,256
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,986
of 57,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Behavioral Medicine
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.