| Title |
No Detectable Association Between Frequency of Marijuana Use and Health or Healthcare Utilization Among Primary Care Patients Who Screen Positive for Drug Use
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-013-2605-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Fuster, Debbie M. Cheng, Donald Allensworth-Davies, Tibor P. Palfai, Jeffrey H. Samet, Richard Saitz |
| Abstract |
Marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug, yet its impact on health and healthcare utilization has not been studied extensively. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Georgia | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 38% |
| Psychology | 9 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 86. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2017.
All research outputs
#482,554
of 25,008,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#384
of 8,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,790
of 208,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,008,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,091 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.