| Title |
Laser-induced autofluorescence for medical diagnosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fluorescence, March 1994
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01876650 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
K. Koenig, H. Schneckenburger |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 112 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 26% |
| Researcher | 30 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 26 | 22% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 18 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,770,267
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fluorescence
#18
of 425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,264
of 22,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fluorescence
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them