Title |
Human Ntera2 cells as a predictive in vitro test system for developmental neurotoxicity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Archives of Toxicology, August 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00204-013-1098-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michael Stern, Andrea Gierse, Saime Tan, Gerd Bicker |
Abstract |
Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) of environmental chemicals is a serious threat to human health. Current DNT testing guidelines propose investigations in rodents, which require large numbers of animals. With regard to the "3Rs" (reduction, replacement, and refinement) of animal testing, alternative testing strategies are needed in order to refine and reduce animal experiments and allow faster and less expensive screening. The goal of this study was to establish components for a human cell-based test system to assess DNT potential of chemicals at an early stage of brain development. A human neural precursor cell line should be tested for suitability for semi-automated high-throughput DNT screening. We established assays suitable for detecting disturbances in two basic processes of brain development in 96-well scale: neuronal differentiation and migration using the human Ntera2 (NT2) cell line. We assessed the effects of four test compounds with well-established DNT potential in comparison with three compounds without specific DNT potential. We found that human NT2 cell cultures treated with the morphogen, retinoic acid, imitate neuronal differentiation, and migration in vitro. The developmental neurotoxicants methylmercury chloride, sodium arsenite, sodium valproate, and methylazoxymethanol significantly reduced the expression of the neuronal marker β-tubulin type III and decreased the migration distance in developing NT2 cells. Both endpoints, differentiation and migration, can be read out directly in a standard fluorescence plate reader, enabling high-throughput screening. We conclude that NT2 cell tests are likely to become valuable components of a human cell-based modular in vitro DNT test systems. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 29% |
Researcher | 9 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 17% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 12% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 12% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 10% |
Chemistry | 5 | 10% |
Other | 11 | 21% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |