| Title |
Habitat and population size of the coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae at Grand Comoro
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Biology of Fishes, September 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00007462 |
| Authors |
Hans Fricke, Karen Hissmann, Jürgen Schauer, Olaf Reinicke, Lutz Kasang, Raphael Plante |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 10 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#3,520,007
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#172
of 1,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,656
of 16,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Biology of Fishes
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,759 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them