↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of more than 400,000 women provides case-control evidence for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2025
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
bluesky
8 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Analysis of more than 400,000 women provides case-control evidence for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant classification
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2025
DOI 10.1038/s41467-025-59979-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Zanti, Denise G. O’Mahony, Michael T. Parsons, Leila Dorling, Joe Dennis, Nicholas J. Boddicker, Wenan Chen, Chunling Hu, Marc Naven, Kristia Yiangou, Thomas U. Ahearn, Christine B. Ambrosone, Irene L. Andrulis, Antonis C. Antoniou, Paul L. Auer, Caroline Baynes, Clara Bodelon, Natalia V. Bogdanova, Stig E. Bojesen, Manjeet K. Bolla, Kristen D. Brantley, Nicola J. Camp, Archie Campbell, Jose E. Castelao, Melissa H. Cessna, Jenny Chang-Claude, Fei Chen, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Don M. Conroy, Kamila Czene, Arcangela De Nicolo, Susan M. Domchek, Thilo Dörk, Alison M. Dunning, A. Heather Eliassen, D. Gareth Evans, Peter A. Fasching, Jonine D. Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Montserrat García-Closas, Gord Glendon, Anna González-Neira, Felix Grassmann, Andreas Hadjisavvas, Christopher A. Haiman, Ute Hamann, Steven N. Hart, Mikael B. A. Hartman, Weang-Kee Ho, James M. Hodge, Reiner Hoppe, Sacha J. Howell, Anna Jakubowska, Elza K. Khusnutdinova, Yon-Dschun Ko, Peter Kraft, Vessela N. Kristensen, James V. Lacey, Jingmei Li, Geok Hoon Lim, Sara Lindström, Artitaya Lophatananon, Craig Luccarini, Arto Mannermaa, Maria Elena Martinez, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Roger L. Milne, Kenneth Muir, Katherine L. Nathanson, Rocio Nuñez-Torres, Nadia Obi, Janet E. Olson, Julie R. Palmer, Mihalis I. Panayiotidis, Alpa V. Patel, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Eric C. Polley, Muhammad U. Rashid, Kathryn J. Ruddy, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J. Sawyer, Marjanka K. Schmidt, Melissa C. Southey, Veronique Kiak-Mien Tan, Soo Hwang Teo, Lauren R. Teras, Diana Torres, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Thérèse Truong, Celine M. Vachon, Qin Wang, Jeffrey N. Weitzel, Siddhartha Yadav, Song Yao, Gary R. Zirpoli, Melissa S. Cline, Peter Devilee, Sean V. Tavtigian, David E. Goldgar, Fergus J. Couch, Douglas F. Easton, Amanda B. Spurdle, Kyriaki Michailidou

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 25 60%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 25 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2025.
All research outputs
#4,805,743
of 32,440,831 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#47,193
of 77,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,085
of 343,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1,298
of 2,551 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,440,831 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,979 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,551 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.