↓ Skip to main content

Breast Cancer Metastasis Issues for the Personalization of Its Prevention and Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Pathology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Breast Cancer Metastasis Issues for the Personalization of Its Prevention and Treatment
Published in
American Journal of Pathology, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.06.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natascia Marino, Stephan Woditschka, L. Tiffany Reed, Joji Nakayama, Musa Mayer, Maria Wetzel, Patricia S. Steeg

Abstract

Despite important progress in adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, metastatic disease often develops in breast cancer patients and remains the leading cause of their deaths. For patients with established metastatic disease, therapy is palliative, with few breaks and with mounting adverse effects. Many have hypothesized that a personalized or precision approach (the terms are used interchangeably) to cancer therapy, in which treatment is based on the individual characteristics of each patient, will provide better outcomes. Here, we discuss the molecular basis of breast cancer metastasis and the challenges in personalization of treatment. The instability of metastatic tumors remains a leading obstacle to personalization, because information from a patient's primary tumor may not accurately reflect the metastasis, and one metastasis may vary from another. Furthermore, the variable presence of tumor subpopulations, such as stem cells and dormant cells, may increase the complexity of the targeted treatments needed. Although molecular signatures and circulating biomarkers have been identified in breast cancer, there is lack of validated predictive molecular markers to optimize treatment choices for either prevention or treatment of metastatic disease. Finally, to maximize the information that can be obtained, increased attention to clinical trial design in the metastasis preventive setting is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Slovakia 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 13 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 10 8%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pathology
#5,200
of 5,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,593
of 209,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pathology
#38
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,904 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.