↓ Skip to main content

Delusions in the nonclinical population

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, May 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
Title
Delusions in the nonclinical population
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, May 2006
DOI 10.1007/s11920-006-0023-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Freeman

Abstract

Delusions have long been considered a hallmark of psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia. However, delusions may only be most visibly present in psychotic conditions and could also occur in nonclinical groups. The aim of this review is to establish whether delusions, as traditionally considered and assessed in psychiatric conditions, are also present in individuals without a psychiatric or neurologic condition. Clear evidence is found that the rate of delusional beliefs in the general population is higher than the rate of psychotic disorders and that delusions occur in individuals without psychosis. The frequency of delusional beliefs in nonclinical populations varies according to the content of the delusion studied and the characteristics of the sample population. Approximately 1% to 3% of the nonclinical population have delusions of a level of severity comparable to clinical cases of psychosis. A further 5% to 6% of the nonclinical population have a delusion but not of such severity. Although less severe, these beliefs are associated with a range of social and emotional difficulties. A further 10% to 15% of the nonclinical population have fairly regular delusional ideation. There is convincing evidence that delusional ideation, delusions, and clinically severe delusions are related experiences. Information about clinical delusions can therefore be obtained by studying delusional ideation in nonclinical populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 10%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 62 55%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 28 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#884,434
of 25,898,387 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#110
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,283
of 86,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,898,387 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them