↓ Skip to main content

The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
470 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
432 Mendeley
Title
The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00134-013-3037-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthieu Schmidt, Elie Zogheib, Hadrien Rozé, Xavier Repesse, Guillaume Lebreton, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Jean-Louis Trouillet, Nicolas Bréchot, Ania Nieszkowska, Hervé Dupont, Alexandre Ouattara, Pascal Leprince, Jean Chastre, Alain Combes

Abstract

This study was designed to identify factors associated with death by 6 months post-intensive care unit (ICU) discharge and to develop a practical mortality risk score for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)-treated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. We also assessed long-term survivors' health-related quality of life (HRQL), respiratory symptoms, and anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 432 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 422 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 14%
Student > Master 52 12%
Other 39 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 37 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Other 117 27%
Unknown 91 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 232 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 8%
Psychology 12 3%
Engineering 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 1%
Other 31 7%
Unknown 109 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,731,699
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,369
of 4,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,857
of 198,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.