↓ Skip to main content

Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success?

Overview of attention for article published in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
240 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Sexual size dimorphism in fallow deer (Dama dama): do larger, heavier males gain greater mating success?
Published in
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, February 2001
DOI 10.1007/s002650000293
Authors

Alan G. McElligott, Martin P. Gammell, Hilda C. Harty, Dean R. Paini, Desmond T. Murphy, James T. Walsh, Thomas J. Hayden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 240 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 213 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 23%
Student > Master 40 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Postgraduate 14 6%
Other 47 20%
Unknown 26 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 144 60%
Environmental Science 19 8%
Arts and Humanities 8 3%
Psychology 7 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Other 16 7%
Unknown 42 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2022.
All research outputs
#7,601,772
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#1,291
of 3,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,850
of 125,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.