↓ Skip to main content

The Use of Hypertonic Saline for Treating Intracranial Hypertension After Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Use of Hypertonic Saline for Treating Intracranial Hypertension After Traumatic Brain Injury
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, June 2006
DOI 10.1213/01.ane.0000217208.51017.56
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayden White, David Cook, Bala Venkatesh

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed a resurgence of interest in the use of hypertonic saline for low-volume resuscitation after trauma. Preliminary studies suggested that benefits are limited to a subgroup of trauma patients with brain injury, but a recent study of prehospital administration of hypertonic saline to patients with traumatic brain injury failed to confirm a benefit. Animal and human studies have demonstrated that hypertonic saline has clinically desirable physiological effects on cerebral blood flow, intracranial pressure, and inflammatory responses in models of neurotrauma. There are few clinical studies in traumatic brain injury with patient survival as an end point. In this review, we examined the experimental and clinical knowledge of hypertonic saline as an osmotherapeutic agent in neurotrauma.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 172 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 26 14%
Student > Postgraduate 23 13%
Researcher 21 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 8%
Student > Master 14 8%
Other 55 31%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 66%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 32 18%