↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Absence Epilepsy Successfully Treated with the Paleolithic Ketogenic Diet

Overview of attention for article published in Neurology and Therapy, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 540)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Childhood Absence Epilepsy Successfully Treated with the Paleolithic Ketogenic Diet
Published in
Neurology and Therapy, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40120-013-0013-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zsófia Clemens, Anna Kelemen, András Fogarasi, Csaba Tóth

Abstract

Childhood absence epilepsy is an epilepsy syndrome responding relatively well to the ketogenic diet with one-third of patients becoming seizure-free. Less restrictive variants of the classical ketogenic diet, however, have been shown to confer similar benefits. Beneficial effects of high fat, low-carbohydrate diets are often explained in evolutionary terms. However, the paleolithic diet itself which advocates a return to the human evolutionary diet has not yet been studied in epilepsy. Here, we present a case of a 7-year-old child with absence epilepsy successfully treated with the paleolithic ketogenic diet alone. In addition to seizure freedom achieved within 6 weeks, developmental and behavioral improvements were noted. The child remained seizure-free when subsequently shifted toward a paleolithic diet. It is concluded that the paleolithic ketogenic diet was effective, safe and feasible in the treatment of this case of childhood absence epilepsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Other 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,448,612
of 25,408,670 outputs
Outputs from Neurology and Therapy
#34
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,777
of 213,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurology and Therapy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,408,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.