↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Age on Stroke Prevention Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Age on Stroke Prevention Therapy in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation
Published in
Stroke, January 2009
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.108.526988
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl van Walraven, Robert G. Hart, Stuart Connolly, Peter C. Austin, Jonathan Mant, F D. Richard Hobbs, Peter J. Koudstaal, Palle Petersen, Francisco Perez-Gomez, J Andre Knottnerus, Beppie Boode, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Daniel E. Singer

Abstract

Stroke risk increases with age in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It is uncertain whether the efficacy of stroke prevention therapies in atrial fibrillation changes as patients age. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of age on the relative efficacy of oral anticoagulants (OAC) and antiplatelet (AP) therapy (including acetylsalicylic acid and triflusal) on ischemic stroke, serious bleeding, and vascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 4 2%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 185 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Master 23 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 56 28%
Unknown 34 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 108 55%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 3%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 51 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#6,146
of 12,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,399
of 186,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#41
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.