↓ Skip to main content

Acute inflammation induced by the biopsy of mouse mammary tumors promotes the development of metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Acute inflammation induced by the biopsy of mouse mammary tumors promotes the development of metastasis
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10549-013-2575-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Hobson, Phani Gummadidala, Brian Silverstrim, Dore Grier, Janice Bunn, Ted James, Mercedes Rincon

Abstract

Development of metastasis in peripheral tissues is a major problem in the fight to cure breast cancer. Although it is becoming evident that chronic inflammation can contribute to tumor progression and metastasis, the effect of acute inflammation in primary tumor is less known. Using mouse models for breast cancer here we show that biopsy of mammary tumors increases the frequency of lung metastases. This effect is associated with the recruitment of inflammatory cells to the lung and elevated levels of certain cytokines such as IL-6 in the lung airways. Antiinflammatory treatment prior to and after the biopsy reduces the development of metastases triggered by the biopsy. In addition, while lack of IL-6 does not affect primary tumor development, it protects from increasing number of metastases upon biopsy. Thus, our studies show that in addition to chronic inflammation, acute immune response caused by invasive procedures in the primary tumor may cause an increased risk on peripheral metastases, but the risk could be decreased by anti-inflammatory treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Professor 2 6%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Unspecified 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,929,940
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#1,510
of 4,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,336
of 195,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#26
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.