↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a Relapse Prevention Program on Sexual Recidivism: Final Results From California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP)

Overview of attention for article published in Sexual Abuse, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Effects of a Relapse Prevention Program on Sexual Recidivism: Final Results From California’s Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP)
Published in
Sexual Abuse, January 2005
DOI 10.1007/s11194-005-1212-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janice K. Marques, Mark Wiederanders, David M. Day, Craig Nelson, Alice van Ommeren

Abstract

Final results from a longitudinal investigation of the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment with sexual offenders are presented. The study was a randomized clinical trial that compared the reoffense rates of offenders treated in an inpatient relapse prevention (RP) program with the rates of offenders in two (untreated) prison control groups. No significant differences were found among the three groups in their rates of sexual or violent reoffending over an 8-year follow-up period. This null result was found for both rapists and child molesters, and was confirmed in analyses using time to reoffense as the outcome and those controlling for static risk differences across the groups. Closer examination of the RP group's performance revealed that individuals who met the program's treatment goals had lower reoffense rates than those who did not. Although our results do not generally support the efficacy of the RP model, they do suggest a number of ways in which this kind of treatment program can be improved. This study also emphasizes the importance of including appropriate control groups in treatment outcome research. Additional controlled investigations are needed to address the many questions that remain about when and how treatment works for sexual offenders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 203 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 21%
Student > Bachelor 36 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Researcher 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 39 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 108 51%
Social Sciences 23 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 2%
Arts and Humanities 5 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 45 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,721,339
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Sexual Abuse
#83
of 680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,181
of 139,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sexual Abuse
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them