Title |
Clinically proven mtDNA mutations are not common in those with chronic fatigue syndrome
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Genomics, March 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12881-017-0387-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elizna M. Schoeman, Francois H. Van Der Westhuizen, Elardus Erasmus, Etresia van Dyk, Charlotte V. Y. Knowles, Shereen Al-Ali, Wan-Fai Ng, Robert W. Taylor, Julia L. Newton, Joanna L. Elson |
Abstract |
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is a prevalent debilitating condition that affects approximately 250,000 people in the UK. There is growing interest in the role of mitochondrial function and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation in CFS. It is now known that fatigue is common and often severe in patients with mitochondrial disease irrespective of their age, gender or mtDNA genotype. More recently, it has been suggested that some CFS patients harbour clinically proven mtDNA mutations. MtDNA sequencing of 93 CFS patients from the United Kingdom (UK) and South Africa (RSA) was performed using an Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine. The sequence data was examined for any evidence of clinically proven mutations, currently; more than 200 clinically proven mtDNA mutations point mutations have been identified. We report the complete mtDNA sequence of 93 CFS patients from the UK and RSA, without finding evidence of clinically proven mtDNA mutations. This finding demonstrates that clinically proven mtDNA mutations are not a common element in the aetiology of disease in CFS patients. That is patients having a clinically proven mtDNA mutation and subsequently being misdiagnosed with CFS are likely to be rare. The work supports the assertion that CFS should not be considered to fall within the spectrum of mtDNA disease. However, the current study cannot exclude a role for nuclear genes with a mitochondrial function, nor a role of mtDNA population variants in susceptibility to disease. This study highlights the need for more to be done to understand the pathophysiology of CFS. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
United States | 3 | 19% |
Australia | 2 | 13% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 19% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 19% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 16% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |