↓ Skip to main content

Adherence to osteoporosis regimens among men and analysis of risk factors of poor compliance: a 2-year analytical review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Adherence to osteoporosis regimens among men and analysis of risk factors of poor compliance: a 2-year analytical review
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chun-Kai Chiu, Ming-Chun Kuo, Shan-Fu Yu, Ben Yu-Jih Su, Tien-Tsai Cheng

Abstract

To investigate adherence and patient-specific factors associated with poor compliance with osteoporosis regimens among men.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Other 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2014.
All research outputs
#14,638,545
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#2,134
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,628
of 205,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#43
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.