↓ Skip to main content

Bacterial diversity in fumarole environments of the Paricutín volcano, Michoacán (Mexico)

Overview of attention for article published in Extremophiles, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Bacterial diversity in fumarole environments of the Paricutín volcano, Michoacán (Mexico)
Published in
Extremophiles, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00792-017-0920-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Miguel Medrano-Santillana, Elcia Margaret Souza-Brito, Robert Duran, Felix Gutierrez-Corona, Georgina Elena Reyna-López

Abstract

Active volcanoes are among the most extreme environments on Earth. The extreme temperatures, presence of toxic heavy metals and low nutrient bioavailability favor the development of extremophiles. We characterized the physical-chemical parameters of and bacterial communities (T-RFLP and 16S rRNA gene libraries) inhabiting fumarole niches of the Paricutín volcano located in Michoacán (Mexico). This volcano, which surged in 1943, is one of the youngest volcanoes on Earth and the microbial diversity in this area is yet to be characterized. The sampling stations were characterized in a pH range from 5.34 to 7.89 and showed different temperatures (soil, 27-87 °C; air, 13.6-56 °C) with high concentrations of metals such as iron and arsenic. The most abundant bacterial populations, confirmed by T-RFLP and 16S rRNA gene libraries, were related to members of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria phyla including sequences associated with thermophiles and sulfate reducing bacteria. Overall, the Paricutín volcano showed low bacterial diversity and its prokaryotic diversity was characterized by the impossibility of amplifying Archaea-related sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2018.
All research outputs
#4,016,212
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Extremophiles
#106
of 800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,012
of 308,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Extremophiles
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.