↓ Skip to main content

Thailand special recruitment track of medical students: a series of annual cross-sectional surveys on the new graduates between 2010 and 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Human Resources for Health, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Thailand special recruitment track of medical students: a series of annual cross-sectional surveys on the new graduates between 2010 and 2012
Published in
Human Resources for Health, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1478-4491-11-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weerasak Putthasri, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Thitikorn Topothai, Thunthita Wisaijohn, Noppakun Thammatacharee, Viroj Tangcharoensathien

Abstract

Comprehensive policies for rural retention of medical doctor and other health professional, including education strategy and mandatory service, have been implemented in Thailand since the 1970s. This study compared the rural attitudes, intention to fulfil mandatory rural service and competencies between medical graduates' from two modes of admission, normal and special tracks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Unknown 64 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 14%
Librarian 6 9%
Other 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 38%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 17 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,759,600
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#550
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,221
of 215,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.