Title |
Thailand special recruitment track of medical students: a series of annual cross-sectional surveys on the new graduates between 2010 and 2012
|
---|---|
Published in |
Human Resources for Health, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-11-47 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Weerasak Putthasri, Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, Thitikorn Topothai, Thunthita Wisaijohn, Noppakun Thammatacharee, Viroj Tangcharoensathien |
Abstract |
Comprehensive policies for rural retention of medical doctor and other health professional, including education strategy and mandatory service, have been implemented in Thailand since the 1970s. This study compared the rural attitudes, intention to fulfil mandatory rural service and competencies between medical graduates' from two modes of admission, normal and special tracks. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Portugal | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 11 | 17% |
Researcher | 9 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 14% |
Librarian | 6 | 9% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 18% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 38% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 6% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,759,600
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#550
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,221
of 215,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.