↓ Skip to main content

A study on the association between C1GALT1 polymorphisms and the risk of Henoch–Schönlein purpura in a Chinese population

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology International, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
A study on the association between C1GALT1 polymorphisms and the risk of Henoch–Schönlein purpura in a Chinese population
Published in
Rheumatology International, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00296-013-2761-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

JinDan An, Qiang Lü, HongTao Zhao, Yong Cao, Bin Yan, Zhihong Ma

Abstract

Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) is the most common systemic vasculitis of childhood. The molecular etiology of HSP is not well understood. The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between polymorphisms in C1GALT1 gene and the risk of HSP in a Chinese population. A total of unrelated 542 northern Chinese were enrolled in this study. PCR-RFLP method was used to genotype the five tagging SNPs in the C1GALT1 gene. Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were used for the comparison of genotype distribution between cases and controls. The five tagging SNPs were all in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in controls. SNP7 was significantly associated with HSP risk, P = 0.005. The DI genotype, compared with the DD genotype, was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing HSP (OR 1.72; 95 % CI 1.11-2.67). The II genotype, compared with the DD genotype, was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing HSP (OR 3.39; 95 % CI 1.16-9.30). Other SNPs were not associated with HSP risk. Variations in the C1GALT1 gene were found to be associated with HSP risk. Further studies are warranted to validate our findings and to investigate into its underlining mechanism.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 43%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 3 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,850,615
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology International
#558
of 2,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,224
of 193,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology International
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.