↓ Skip to main content

Programming Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Patients with Primary Prevention Indication to Prolong Time to First Shock: Results from the PROVIDE Study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
118 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Programming Implantable Cardioverter‐Defibrillators in Patients with Primary Prevention Indication to Prolong Time to First Shock: Results from the PROVIDE Study
Published in
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, September 2013
DOI 10.1111/jce.12273
Pubmed ID
Authors

MOHAMMAD SAEED, IBRAHIM HANNA, DIONYSSIOS ROBOTIS, ROBERT STYPEREK, LEO POLOSAJIAN, AHMED KHAN, JOSEPH ALONSO, YELENA NABUTOVSKY, CURTIS NEASON

Abstract

Shock therapy delivery by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) can be painful and may have adverse consequences. Reducing shock burden for patients with ICDs would be beneficial.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 17 20%
Researcher 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 51 59%
Engineering 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 22 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2014.
All research outputs
#16,686,424
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
#2,119
of 2,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,490
of 208,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
#17
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.