↓ Skip to main content

Describing the impact of aphasia on close family members using the ICF framework

Overview of attention for article published in Disability & Rehabilitation, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Describing the impact of aphasia on close family members using the ICF framework
Published in
Disability & Rehabilitation, September 2013
DOI 10.3109/09638288.2013.834984
Pubmed ID
Authors

Meghann Grawburg, Tami Howe, Linda Worrall, Nerina Scarinci

Abstract

Abstract Purpose: Aphasia is a communication disorder associated with impairments in spoken language, understanding, reading and writing that impacts upon daily activities, participation in society and the quality of life of those with the condition and their family members. Despite existing literature demonstrating the pervasive and significant effects of aphasia on family members, rehabilitation programming, policy and funding are not well developed. The aim of this qualitative study was to describe the impact of aphasia on family members in the context of changes to their functioning and disability using the framework of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Application of ICF concept of disability or "third-party disability" to family members of people with a health condition is discussed. Method: Twenty family members participated in individual in-depth semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Research codes generated were subsequently mapped to the ICF. Results: The results of this study showed that family members experienced positive, neutral and/or negative changes to their body functions and activities and participation due to their significant other's aphasia. Moreover, some family members attributed the development of a health condition or exacerbation of an existing health condition to the aphasia. Conclusion: Interpreted within the framework of the ICF, the results of this qualitative study reveal that family members of people with aphasia experience changes to their functioning and disability, known as "third-party functioning and disability", as a consequence of the health condition of a significant other. Implications for Rehabilitation Use of the ICF framework to describe the effects of aphasia on family members may improve rehabilitation programming, policy and funding for family-centred rehabilitation. Aphasia can lead to the development or exacerbation of health conditions (e.g. anxiety) in family members. In ICF terminology, negative changes (e.g. worry, increased duties and financial strain) that family members experience due to aphasia are called third-party disability and may result in impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions. Similarly, positive changes (e.g. appreciation, learning and increased tolerance) that family members experience may be called third-party functioning and classified with the ICF as changes to their body functioning, activities and participation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 169 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 42 24%
Student > Master 27 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Researcher 14 8%
Professor 7 4%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 40 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 16%
Psychology 20 11%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Neuroscience 10 6%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Disability & Rehabilitation
#3,779
of 4,054 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,629
of 215,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Disability & Rehabilitation
#30
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,054 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.