↓ Skip to main content

Recent Advances in Sleep-Wake Cycle and Biological Rhythms in Bipolar Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Recent Advances in Sleep-Wake Cycle and Biological Rhythms in Bipolar Disorder
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11920-013-0402-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rébecca Robillard, Sharon L. Naismith, Ian B. Hickie

Abstract

The cyclical nature of periodic switches in energy, motor activation and sleep-wake cycles in bipolar disorder suggests a strong underlying relationship with disturbances in chronobiology. Current research is refining our understanding of the various patterns of sleep-wake and biological rhythms alterations at early and later stages of this illness, as well as across its depressive/fatigue, manic/hypomanic and euthymic phases. This research focuses on early detection and subsequent monitoring to predict and better manage recurrent episodes. Sleep-wake cycle and biological rhythms disturbances are also well known to affect other key aspects of physical health (notably metabolic functions), cognitive performance and elevated risks for suicide. Increasing evidence now supports the integration of behavioural or pharmacological therapeutic strategies that target the sleep-wake and circadian systems in the ongoing treatment of various phases of bipolar disorder.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 109 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 10%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 24 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 25%
Psychology 27 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 29 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2016.
All research outputs
#18,148,462
of 23,314,015 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1,013
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,673
of 203,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#24
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,314,015 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.