↓ Skip to main content

Radiosurgery for central neurocytoma: long-term outcome and failure pattern

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
Title
Radiosurgery for central neurocytoma: long-term outcome and failure pattern
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11060-013-1253-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jin Wook Kim, Dong Gyu Kim, Hyun-Tai Chung, Seung Hong Choi, Jung Ho Han, Chul-Kee Park, Chae-Yong Kim, Sun Ha Paek, Hee-Won Jung

Abstract

Despite the favorable outcomes of radiosurgery for central neurocytoma (CN), these results are based on case series that included a limited number of patients and short follow-up periods because of the scarcity of CN. Because CN is a benign tumor with an indolent clinical course, long-term follow-up and analysis of failure pattern are required for the establishment of the role of radiosurgery in the management of CN. Twenty consecutive patients (10 patients who received Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) as a primary treatment and 10 patients who received GKRS as a secondary treatment) with a radiological follow-up period ≥36 months were included in this study. The mean radiological follow-up duration was 100 months (range 43-149 months). The mean tumor volume was 10.4 cm(3) (range 0.4-36.4 cm(3)) and the mean marginal dose was 15.4 Gy (range 9-20 Gy). Local control failure was found in six patients at the last radiological follow-up. Overall actuarial local control rates were 89.5 % at 5 years and 83.1 % at 10 years. The primary GKRS group included two cases with local failure, with cyst formation or local recurrence. In contrast, in the secondary GKRS group, local control failure was found in four cases (including three cases with an "out-of-field recurrence" pattern) and occurred earlier compared with the primary GKRS group. Our study suggests that GKRS could be a primary or secondary treatment option for CN. However, long-term radiological follow-up is mandatory. In particular, more careful consideration during margin delineation and planning procedure is required in the secondary GKRS group.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 3 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 47%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Physics and Astronomy 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,189,266
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#967
of 2,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,282
of 203,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#6
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.