↓ Skip to main content

A review of the relationship between tooth loss, periodontal disease, and cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
268 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
A review of the relationship between tooth loss, periodontal disease, and cancer
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, May 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10552-008-9163-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mara S. Meyer, Kaumudi Joshipura, Edward Giovannucci, Dominique S. Michaud

Abstract

Recent studies have investigated the association between periodontal disease, tooth loss, and several systemic diseases including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and preterm birth. Periodontal disease, a chronic inflammatory condition, is highly prevalent in adult populations around the world, and may be preventable. Estimates of prevalence vary between races and geographic regions, with a marked increase in the occurrence of periodontal disease with advancing age. Worldwide estimates for the prevalence of severe periodontal disease generally range from 10 to 15%. The relationship between oral health and cancer has been examined for a number of specific cancer sites. Several studies have reported associations between periodontal disease or tooth loss and risk of oral, upper gastrointestinal, lung, and pancreatic cancer in different populations. In a number of studies, these associations persisted after adjustment for major risk factors, including cigarette smoking and socioeconomic status. This review provides a summary of these findings, discusses possible biological mechanisms involved, and raises methodological issues related to studying these relationships.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 236 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 34 14%
Student > Master 31 13%
Researcher 26 11%
Other 15 6%
Other 48 20%
Unknown 53 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 114 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 5%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 57 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,046,514
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#90
of 2,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,203
of 101,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.