↓ Skip to main content

Geochemical Consequences of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Coral Reefs

Overview of attention for article published in Science, April 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1070 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1229 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geochemical Consequences of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide on Coral Reefs
Published in
Science, April 1999
DOI 10.1126/science.284.5411.118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan A. Kleypas, Robert W. Buddemeier, David Archer, Jean-Pierre Gattuso, Chris Langdon, Bradley N. Opdyke

Abstract

A coral reef represents the net accumulation of calcium carbonate (CaCO3) produced by corals and other calcifying organisms. If calcification declines, then reef-building capacity also declines. Coral reef calcification depends on the saturation state of the carbonate mineral aragonite of surface waters. By the middle of the next century, an increased concentration of carbon dioxide will decrease the aragonite saturation state in the tropics by 30 percent and biogenic aragonite precipitation by 14 to 30 percent. Coral reefs are particularly threatened, because reef-building organisms secrete metastable forms of CaCO3, but the biogeochemical consequences on other calcifying marine ecosystems may be equally severe.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 26 2%
Germany 10 <1%
Brazil 9 <1%
Mexico 7 <1%
Australia 7 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
South Africa 4 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Other 27 2%
Unknown 1128 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 246 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 242 20%
Student > Master 198 16%
Student > Bachelor 149 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 4%
Other 195 16%
Unknown 147 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 429 35%
Environmental Science 290 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 204 17%
Chemistry 25 2%
Engineering 25 2%
Other 79 6%
Unknown 177 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#717,610
of 24,486,486 outputs
Outputs from Science
#14,638
of 79,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269
of 36,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#12
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,486,486 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 36,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.