| Title |
The La Pintada landslide, Guerrero, Mexico: hints from the Pre-Classic to the disasters of modern times
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Landslides, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10346-017-0808-9 |
| Authors |
Irasema Alcántara-Ayala, Ricardo J. Garnica-Peña, Leobardo Domínguez-Morales, Alberto E. González-Huesca, Alberto Calderón-Vega |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 29% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 18% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 12% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 24% |
| Engineering | 4 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#2,926,282
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Landslides
#62
of 523 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,531
of 310,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Landslides
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 523 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,524 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.