↓ Skip to main content

Solving a wind turbine maintenance scheduling problem

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Solving a wind turbine maintenance scheduling problem
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10951-017-0513-5
Authors

Aurélien Froger, Michel Gendreau, Jorge E. Mendoza, Eric Pinson, Louis-Martin Rousseau

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 18%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 17 39%
Decision Sciences 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Mathematics 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,852,691
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#65
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,214
of 333,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.