↓ Skip to main content

The pre-metastatic niche: finding common ground

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
359 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
382 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The pre-metastatic niche: finding common ground
Published in
Cancer and Metastasis Reviews, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10555-013-9420-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaclyn Sceneay, Mark J. Smyth, Andreas Möller

Abstract

It is rapidly becoming evident that the formation of tumor-promoting pre-metastatic niches in secondary organs adds a previously unrecognized degree of complexity to the challenge of curing metastatic disease. Primary tumor cells orchestrate pre-metastatic niche formation through secretion of a variety of cytokines and growth factors that promote mobilization and recruitment of bone marrow-derived cells to future metastatic sites. Hypoxia within the primary tumor, and secretion of specific microvesicles termed exosomes, are emerging as important processes and vehicles for tumor-derived factors to modulate pre-metastatic sites. It has also come to light that reduced immune surveillance is a novel mechanism through which primary tumors create favorable niches in secondary organs. This review provides an overview of our current understanding of underlying mechanisms of pre-metastatic niche formation and highlights the common links as well as discrepancies between independent studies. Furthermore, the possible clinical implications, links to metastatic persistence and dormancy, and novel approaches for treatment of metastatic disease through reversal of pre-metastatic niche formation are identified and explored.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 366 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 102 27%
Researcher 46 12%
Student > Master 45 12%
Student > Bachelor 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 46 12%
Unknown 87 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 67 18%
Engineering 17 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 3%
Other 28 7%
Unknown 95 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,157,787
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#113
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,632
of 192,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer and Metastasis Reviews
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.