↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Why we write (and how we can do it better)

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Why we write (and how we can do it better)
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2010
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.101329
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Peterkin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,504,303
of 23,749,054 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4,838
of 8,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,739
of 98,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#37
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,749,054 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.