| Title |
Prioritizing erosion-prone area through morphometric analysis: an RS and GIS perspective
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Applied Water Science, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13201-013-0129-7 |
| Authors |
Sarita Gajbhiye, S. K. Mishra, Ashish Pandey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 148 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Researcher | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 23% |
| Engineering | 28 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#5,850,615
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Applied Water Science
#23
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,715
of 203,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Water Science
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them