| Title |
A closeup study of early beech litter decomposition: potential drivers and microbial interactions on a changing substrate
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant and Soil, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11104-013-1671-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Brandstätter, Katharina Keiblinger, Wolfgang Wanek, Sophie Zechmeister-Boltenstern |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 23% |
| Researcher | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 42% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2013.
All research outputs
#6,969,621
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#761
of 3,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,093
of 226,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#7
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,616 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.