You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Public Views on Food Addiction and Obesity: Implications for Policy and Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, September 2013
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0074836 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Natalia M. Lee, Jayne Lucke, Wayne D. Hall, Carla Meurk, Frances M. Boyle, Adrian Carter |
Abstract |
According to their advocates, neurobiological explanations of overeating, or "food addiction", have the potential to impact public understanding and treatment of obesity. In this study, we examine the public's acceptance of the concept of food addiction as an explanation of overeating and assess its effects upon their attitudes toward obese persons and the treatment of obesity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 10 | 32% |
Australia | 10 | 32% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Colombia | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 52% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 26% |
Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Pakistan | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 150 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 27 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 25 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 9% |
Researcher | 13 | 8% |
Other | 27 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 38 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 19% |
Neuroscience | 11 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Other | 26 | 17% |
Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#568,776
of 24,851,605 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#7,833
of 215,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,665
of 209,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#197
of 4,880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,851,605 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.