| Title |
Explicitly Teaching Critical Thinking Skills in a History Course
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science & Education, March 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11191-017-9878-2 |
| Authors |
Anne Collins McLaughlin, Alicia Ebbitt McGill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 29% |
| Australia | 4 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 76% |
| Scientists | 12 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Macao | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 145 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 33 | 21% |
| Psychology | 22 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 38 | 25% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2023.
All research outputs
#191,367
of 25,121,016 outputs
Outputs from Science & Education
#3
of 791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,103
of 315,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science & Education
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,121,016 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 791 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.