↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Ambulatory Hemodynamic Monitoring Reduces Heart Failure Hospitalizations in “Real-World” Clinical Practice

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
65 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
24 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
Title
Ambulatory Hemodynamic Monitoring Reduces Heart Failure Hospitalizations in “Real-World” Clinical Practice
Published in
JACC, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akshay S. Desai, Arvind Bhimaraj, Rupinder Bharmi, Rita Jermyn, Kunjan Bhatt, David Shavelle, Margaret M. Redfield, Robert Hull, Jamie Pelzel, Kevin Davis, Nirav Dalal, Philip B. Adamson, J. Thomas Heywood

Abstract

In the CHAMPION trial, heart failure hospitalization (HFH) rates were lower in patients managed with guidance from an implantable pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) sensor compared to usual care. To examine the effectiveness of ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring in reducing HFH outside the clinical trial setting. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using US Medicare claims data from patients undergoing PAP sensor implantation between 6/1/2014 and 12/31/2015. Rates of HFH during predefined periods before and after implantation were compared using the Andersen-Gill extension to the Cox proportional hazards model while accounting for the competing risk of death, ventricular assist device (VAD), or cardiac transplantation. Comprehensive HF-related costs were compared over the same periods. Among 1114 implanted patients, there were 1020 HFH in the 6 months before, compared with 381 HFH, 139 deaths, and 17 VAD/transplants in the 6 months after implantation (HR 0.55, 95%CI 0.49-0.61, p < 0.001). This lower rate of HFH was associated with a 6-month comprehensive HF cost reduction of $7,433 per patient (95%CI, $7,000-7,884) and was robust in analyses restricted to 6-month survivors. Similar reductions in HFH and costs were noted in the subset of 480 patients with complete data available for 12 months before and after implantation (HR 0.66, 95%CI 0.57-0.76, P<0.001). As in clinical trials, use of ambulatory hemodynamic monitoring in clinical practice reduces HFH and comprehensive HF costs. These benefits are sustained to one year and support the 'real world' effectiveness of this approach to HF management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 123 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 21 17%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Master 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 23 19%
Unknown 36 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Unspecified 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 47 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 529. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2020.
All research outputs
#47,171
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#114
of 16,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,006
of 323,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#4
of 341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.