↓ Skip to main content

Cortical surface‐based threshold‐free cluster enhancement and cortexwise mediation

Overview of attention for article published in Human Brain Mapping, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical surface‐based threshold‐free cluster enhancement and cortexwise mediation
Published in
Human Brain Mapping, March 2017
DOI 10.1002/hbm.23563
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tristram A. Lett, Lea Waller, Heike Tost, Ilya M. Veer, Arash Nazeri, Susanne Erk, Eva J. Brandl, Katrin Charlet, Anne Beck, Sabine Vollstädt‐Klein, Anne Jorde, Falk Kiefer, Andreas Heinz, Andreas Meyer‐Lindenberg, M. Mallar Chakravarty, Henrik Walter

Abstract

Threshold-free cluster enhancement (TFCE) is a sensitive means to incorporate spatial neighborhood information in neuroimaging studies without using arbitrary thresholds. The majority of methods have applied TFCE to voxelwise data. The need to understand the relationship among multiple variables and imaging modalities has become critical. We propose a new method of applying TFCE to vertexwise statistical images as well as cortexwise (either voxel- or vertexwise) mediation analysis. Here we present TFCE_mediation, a toolbox that can be used for cortexwise multiple regression analysis with TFCE, and additionally cortexwise mediation using TFCE. The toolbox is open source and publicly available (https://github.com/trislett/TFCE_mediation). We validated TFCE_mediation in healthy controls from two independent multimodal neuroimaging samples (N = 199 and N = 183). We found a consistent structure-function relationship between surface area and the first independent component (IC1) of the N-back task, that white matter fractional anisotropy is strongly associated with IC1 N-back, and that our voxel-based results are essentially identical to FSL randomise using TFCE (all PFWE <0.05). Using cortexwise mediation, we showed that the relationship between white matter FA and IC1 N-back is mediated by surface area in the right superior frontal cortex (PFWE  < 0.05). We also demonstrated that the same mediation model is present using vertexwise mediation (PFWE  < 0.05). In conclusion, cortexwise analysis with TFCE provides an effective analysis of multimodal neuroimaging data. Furthermore, cortexwise mediation analysis may identify or explain a mechanism that underlies an observed relationship among a predictor, intermediary, and dependent variables in which one of these variables is assessed at a whole-brain scale. Hum Brain Mapp, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 33%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Master 8 15%
Other 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 14 27%
Psychology 10 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#19,303,935
of 24,578,676 outputs
Outputs from Human Brain Mapping
#3,578
of 4,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,388
of 314,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Brain Mapping
#77
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,578,676 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.