↓ Skip to main content

In Situ Speciation and Distribution of Toxic Selenium in Hydrated Roots of Cowpea    

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Physiology, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In Situ Speciation and Distribution of Toxic Selenium in Hydrated Roots of Cowpea    
Published in
Plant Physiology, July 2013
DOI 10.1104/pp.113.222299
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peng Wang, Neal W. Menzies, Enzo Lombi, Brigid A. McKenna, Martin D. de Jonge, David J. Paterson, Daryl L. Howard, Chris J. Glover, Simon James, Peter Kappen, Bernt Johannessen, Peter M. Kopittke

Abstract

The speciation and spatial distribution of selenium (Se) in hydrated plant tissues is not well understood. Using synchrotron-based x-ray absorption spectroscopy and x-ray fluorescence microscopy (two-dimensional scanning [and associated mathematical model] and computed tomography), the speciation and distribution of toxic Se were examined within hydrated roots of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) exposed to either 20 µM selenite or selenate. Based upon bulk solution concentrations, selenate was 9-fold more toxic to the roots than selenite, most likely due to increased accumulation of organoselenium (e.g. selenomethionine) in selenate-treated roots. Specifically, uptake of selenate (probably by sulfate transporters) occurred at a much higher rate than for selenite (apparently by both passive diffusion and phosphate transporters), with bulk root tissue Se concentrations approximately 18-fold higher in the selenate treatment. Although the proportion of Se converted to organic forms was higher for selenite (100%) than for selenate (26%), the absolute concentration of organoselenium was actually approximately 5-fold higher for selenate-treated roots. In addition, the longitudinal and radial distribution of Se in roots differed markedly: the highest tissue concentrations were in the endodermis and cortex approximately 4 mm or more behind the apex when exposed to selenate but in the meristem (approximately 1 mm from the apex) when exposed to selenite. The examination of the distribution and speciation of Se in hydrated roots provides valuable data in understanding Se uptake, transport, and toxicity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 27%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 37%
Chemistry 6 12%
Environmental Science 4 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,348,542
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Plant Physiology
#10,848
of 11,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,765
of 194,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Physiology
#48
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,559 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.