↓ Skip to main content

Synthesising 30 Years of Mathematical Modelling of Echinococcus Transmission

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synthesising 30 Years of Mathematical Modelling of Echinococcus Transmission
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, August 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002386
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jo-An M. Atkinson, Gail M. Williams, Laith Yakob, Archie C. A. Clements, Tamsin S. Barnes, Donald P. McManus, Yu Rong Yang, Darren J. Gray

Abstract

Echinococcosis is a complex zoonosis that has domestic and sylvatic lifecycles, and a range of different intermediate and definitive host species. The complexities of its transmission and the sparse evidence on the effectiveness of control strategies in diverse settings provide significant challenges for the design of effective public health policy against this disease. Mathematical modelling is a useful tool for simulating control packages under locally specific transmission conditions to inform optimal timing and frequency of phased interventions for cost-effective control of echinococcosis. The aims of this review of 30 years of Echinococcus modelling were to discern the epidemiological mechanisms underpinning models of Echinococcus granulosus and E. multilocularis transmission and to establish the need to include a human transmission component in such models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 21%
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 7 9%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Mathematics 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,879,822
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#6,474
of 9,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,890
of 212,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#110
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,430 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.