↓ Skip to main content

Significant Change in Marine Plankton Structure and Carbon Production After the Addition of River Water in a Mesocosm Experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Significant Change in Marine Plankton Structure and Carbon Production After the Addition of River Water in a Mesocosm Experiment
Published in
Microbial Ecology, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00248-017-0962-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Fouilland, A. Trottet, C. Alves-de-Souza, D. Bonnet, T. Bouvier, M. Bouvy, S. Boyer, L. Guillou, E. Hatey, H. Jing, C. Leboulanger, E. Le Floc’h, H. Liu, S. Mas, B. Mostajir, J. Nouguier, D. Pecqueur, E. Rochelle-Newall, C. Roques, C. Salles, M.-G. Tournoud, C. Vasseur, F. Vidussi

Abstract

Rivers are known to be major contributors to eutrophication in marine coastal waters, but little is known on the short-term impact of freshwater surges on the structure and functioning of the marine plankton community. The effect of adding river water, reducing the salinity by 15 and 30%, on an autumn plankton community in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Thau Lagoon, France) was determined during a 6-day mesocosm experiment. Adding river water brought not only nutrients but also chlorophyceans that did not survive in the brackish mesocosm waters. The addition of water led to initial increases (days 1-2) in bacterial production as well as increases in the abundances of bacterioplankton and picoeukaryotes. After day 3, the increases were more significant for diatoms and dinoflagellates that were already present in the Thau Lagoon water (mainly Pseudo-nitzschia spp. group delicatissima and Prorocentrum triestinum) and other larger organisms (tintinnids, rotifers). At the same time, the abundances of bacterioplankton, cyanobacteria, and picoeukaryote fell, some nutrients (NH4(+), SiO4(3-)) returned to pre-input levels, and the plankton structure moved from a trophic food web based on secondary production to the accumulation of primary producers in the mesocosms with added river water. Our results also show that, after freshwater inputs, there is rapid emergence of plankton species that are potentially harmful to living organisms. This suggests that flash flood events may lead to sanitary issues, other than pathogens, in exploited marine areas.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Professor 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 7 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#15,450,375
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#1,474
of 2,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,694
of 308,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#24
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.