↓ Skip to main content

No evidence for an afrotherian-like delayed dental eruption in South American notoungulates

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
No evidence for an afrotherian-like delayed dental eruption in South American notoungulates
Published in
The Science of Nature, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00114-011-0795-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guillaume Billet, Thomas Martin

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Panama 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 39%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Unknown 6 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2017.
All research outputs
#21,141,111
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#2,076
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,701
of 110,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#20
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.