↓ Skip to main content

DNA barcoding significantly improves resolution of invasive lionfish diet in the Northern Gulf of Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Invasions, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
DNA barcoding significantly improves resolution of invasive lionfish diet in the Northern Gulf of Mexico
Published in
Biological Invasions, March 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10530-017-1407-3
Authors

Kristen A. Dahl, William F. Patterson, Alison Robertson, Alice C. Ortmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 24%
Researcher 15 20%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 45%
Environmental Science 11 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 19 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,337,934
of 22,961,203 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#1,732
of 2,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,869
of 333,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#42
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,961,203 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.