↓ Skip to main content

Impact of diet on adult hippocampal neurogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Genes & Nutrition, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 390)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
12 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
Title
Impact of diet on adult hippocampal neurogenesis
Published in
Genes & Nutrition, August 2009
DOI 10.1007/s12263-009-0134-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Doris Stangl, Sandrine Thuret

Abstract

Research over the last 5 years has firmly established that learning and memory abilities, as well as mood, can be influenced by diet, although the mechanisms by which diet modulates mental health are not well understood. One of the brain structures associated with learning and memory, as well as mood, is the hippocampus. Interestingly, the hippocampus is one of the two structures in the adult brain where the formation of newborn neurons, or neurogenesis, persists. The level of neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus has been linked directly to cognition and mood. Therefore, modulation of adult hippocampal neurogenesis (AHN) by diet emerges as a possible mechanism by which nutrition impacts on mental health. In this study, we give an overview of the mechanisms and functional implications of AHN and summarize recent findings regarding the modulation of AHN by diet.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 342 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 16%
Student > Bachelor 51 15%
Researcher 42 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 65 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 83 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 63 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 11%
Psychology 32 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 6%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 76 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2021.
All research outputs
#573,129
of 23,120,280 outputs
Outputs from Genes & Nutrition
#9
of 390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,429
of 112,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genes & Nutrition
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,120,280 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.