↓ Skip to main content

La charge de travail des agents de santé dans un contexte de gratuité des soins au Burkina Faso et au Niger

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 213)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
La charge de travail des agents de santé dans un contexte de gratuité des soins au Burkina Faso et au Niger
Published in
Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique, September 2013
DOI 10.1007/s13149-013-0307-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Antarou, V. Ridde, S. Kouanda, L. Queuille

Abstract

User fees exemption policy supported by NGOs in Burkina Faso and Niger resulted in a higher utilization of health services in primary health care facilities. We conducted a survey in 2 health districts in Burkina Faso and Niger in 2011. The study objective was to assess whether the higher utilization associated with the user fees exemption policy, may result in an overload for health staff at the front line in health facilities. The WHO's recommended WISN method was used to compute a ratio of actual/required staff using a comparative study with 4 control facilities and 4 intervention sites where the user fees exemption policy was provided by local NGOs in both countries. Overall, 8 primary health facilities both in Burkina Faso and Niger were involved. In Burkina Faso, the ratio was ≥1 in all facilities both control and intervention, i.e. a sufficient staff in facilities. In Niger, 3 out of the 4 intervention facilities in Keita district were found to have a ratio ≤1, i.e. understaffed. In the 4 control facilities, the staff was sufficient with a ratio ≥1. In Burkina Faso, the actual number of staff in facilities appeared enough to face the higher utilization of health services that may follow the user fees exemption policy supported by local NGOs unlike Niger where we found that the actual number of staff was insufficient to face a possible higher utilization resulting from the same policy in intervention facilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Niger 1 6%
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 16 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 8 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,709,261
of 22,723,682 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique
#11
of 213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,872
of 203,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin de la Société de pathologie exotique
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,723,682 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 213 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them